Why is health screening important?
Inherited diseases fall into two broad classes: simple and complex.
1) Simple inherited diseases are the result of mutation of a single gene and represent around 70-75% of the known inherited diseases in the dog. The mutation may be recessive or dominant. If recessive, then a dog has to inherit the recessive mutation from both parents before it is clinically affected; a dog that has one recessive mutant gene version and one normal gene version is a clinically normal carrier. If a dog inherits a dominant mutant gene from either of its parents it will usually be clinically affected despite having a normal copy of the relevant gene. Often, individual breeds, or related breeds, will have a predisposition to these simple, single gene disorders, although even in predisposed breeds, the prevalence of the disease is usually, but not always, low.
2) Complex inherited diseases are often described as multifactorial because they involve the inheritance of a number of different mutant genes, that is, they are polygenic, and the clinical expression of these mutant genes can be altered by environmental influences. These complex diseases give rise to clinical conditions that worry breeders the most, diseases like hip and elbow dysplasia, epilepsy and heart disease. These complex diseases rarely show breed specificity and are seen across many different breeds as well as being described in both cross breed and mixed breed populations, often at prevalences akin to those seen in pure breed populations.
Some inherited conditions only become apparent at later stages in a dog’s life. One other important consideration is that not all inherited conditions are congenital, i.e. present at birth. It should also be remembered that not all congenital conditions are inherited.
Sometimes the clinical consequences of an inherited disease do not become apparent in an affected dog until late in the dog’s life, and these late onset diseases present real challenges to the dog breeder because a dog could be well past its reproductive phase, and have been bred from, before it’s clinically affected state is recognised.
What can breeders do?
Breeders of pure bred dogs have a real opportunity to address these inherited diseases and reduce their prevalence, because it is the breeder that decides which sire is to be mated to which dam to produce a litter of puppies. It is thus possible, where screening schemes are available, for breeders to screen all of their potential breeding stock for signs of these inherited diseases, before they are bred from, and then use the results to formulate breeding programmes to reduce the prevalence of the diseases in future generations. Putting all of the potential breeding stock through these health screening schemes gives breeders a better understanding of the kind of genes a particular dog carries and therefore what it is likely to pass on to its offspring. Armed with this information breeders can avoid mating two dogs that have an increased chance of producing clinically affected puppies.
What health screening schemes are available?
There are two general types of health screening programmes that are available to dog breeders: Clinical screening programmes and DNA testing schemes.
Clinical Screening Programmes
Look for clinical signs of the disease in an individual dog; these screening programmes identify clinically affected dogs. The Kennel Club, in conjunction with the British Veterinary Association (BVA), runs three such clinical screening schemes:
1) The BVA/KC Hip Scoring Scheme which has been designed to address the problem of hip dysplasia, one of those complex inherited diseases. The scheme evaluates radiographs that have been taken of an individual dog’s hips. Each hip is evaluated by two experts who score nine anatomical features of the hip and score each hip out of a total of 53. The two hip scores are then added together to give the dog’s overall hip score. So, a dog’s hip score can range from 0 – 106, and the lower the hip score the better the anatomy of the dog’s hips. In breeds where significant numbers of dogs have been through the hip scheme it is possible to calculate a breed mean hip score, which gives a feel for the average quality of the hips within that breed.
Advice to breeders is to use dogs with hip scores well below the breed mean score for breeding. Current Breed Mean Scores (BMS) can be viewed here.
2) The BVA/KC Elbow Grading Scheme, to address elbow dysplasia. Again, each dog is assessed from radiographs that are taken of the dog’s elbows. Each elbow is graded on a scale of 0-3, again by two specialists. The lower the grade the better the elbow’s anatomy. In this scheme if the dog has two different elbow grades, the higher of the two is used as the dog’s elbow grade.
Advice to breeders is to use only dogs with an elbow grade of 0 or 1 for breeding.
3) The BVA/KC/ISDS (International Sheep Dog Society) Eye Scheme. This scheme has a list, Schedule A, which contains all of the known inherited eye diseases and the breeds that are currently known to be affected by these conditions. It also has a Schedule B, which lists breeds and conditions where further investigation is urged. Specialist panelists, appointed by the BVA, can examine any individual dog for clinical signs of these diseases. Because some of these inherited eye diseases are not congenital, breeders are advised to have their breeding stock examined each year throughout their dog’s life.
A current list of breeds and conditions on
Schedule A and Schedule B can be viewed here
Results are published by the Kennel Club
The outcome of each of these three schemes is a certificate which states the observations made during the screening process. A copy of this report is returned to the owner/agent of the dog and a second copy is sent directly to the KC, where the information is noted on the dog’s record on the KC registration database. So, for the hip and elbow schemes the dog’s hip score and elbow grade are recorded on the database. The results of the eye scheme are recorded as either clear of clinical signs of the conditions specific for the breed on Schedule A, or affected by one or more of the breed conditions. Once this information is deposited on the registration database it will be published in the next available Breed Records Supplement (BRS) against the dog’s KC registered name, and it will also appear on any new registration document issued for the dog and on the registration documents of all of the tested dog’s future progeny.
Breed Clubs run health screening schemes too.
Besides these three BVA/KC Health Screening Schemes, individual breed clubs can also have their own health screening programmes, organised by the breed club using specialist veterinarians that they have identified. For example, the Cavalier King Charles Spaniel Breed Clubs have established a heart testing scheme to look for clinical signs of a heart disease known as mitral valve disease in the breed. The Boxer breed clubs have a similar heart screening programme, but this time for a heart condition known as aortic stenosis. The results of these screening programmes are collated and disseminated by the breed clubs.
DNA Testing Schemes
The second type of health screening programme available to breeders can give results with a lot more clarity. The last ten years has seen spectacular progress in our understanding of the canine genome, the genes that make up the dog. Significant technological advances and injection of substantial funding to support research means that we are now able to directly read the genetic code that is embedded in each and every one of the 20,000-or so canine genes. This means that not only can we now identify the genes that are involved in inherited disease in the dog, but we can also identify the mutation, the error in the gene’s code, that is responsible for the disease.
DNA tests give unequivocal results
One of the very practical consequences that this understanding has given us is the ability to develop very simple DNA tests that can be used to determine whether an individual dog possesses one or two copies of a mutant, disease-causing gene. At the moment, DNA tests only exist for the mutations involved in the simple, single gene conditions, but world-wide the number of these inherited diseases for which DNA tests have been developed must be approaching 100. Use of these tests is very straightforward and relatively inexpensive. Some tests require a small blood sample, which needs to be drawn by a qualified person, but increasingly these DNA tests are based on a simple mouth swab that is totally non-invasive and can be performed by the dog’s owner. A small brush is used to gently rub the inside of the dog’s cheek. The loose cheek cells that this removes stick to the bristles of the brush, which is then dried and returned by post to the laboratory, where the cheek cells are broken open to liberate their DNA, which is produced in sufficient amounts to allow the genetic status of any dog to be determined. Since most of these single gene disorders are the result of a single recessive mutation, the usual outcome of one of these DNA tests is that the dog is identified as normal (two copies of the normal gene), a carrier (one copy of the normal gene and one copy of the mutant gene) or affected (two copies of the mutant gene).
The Kennel Club has embraced this new technology
Realising that it provides powerful new tools for breeders to use in their efforts to minimise the spread of inherited diseases to future generations, the Kennel Club Charitable Trust has provided substantial research funds to facilitate the development of further DNA tests and the Kennel Club has worked with relevant breed clubs and councils to develop DNA testing schemes for diseases that are known to affect their breed. These official DNA Testing Schemes involve collaboration between the Kennel Club, the breed clubs and the DNA testing facility.
Under one of these schemes, the breeder/owner agrees for the result of their tested dog to be sent independently to the Kennel Club by the testing laboratory. The Kennel Club then notes the result on the dog’s record in the registration database, which triggers publication in the same way as described above for hip scores, elbow grades and the outcome of eye testing. In addition, lists of tested dogs and their DNA result are maintained and updated on the Kennel Club web site.
Using DNA technology to eradicate disease from breeds.
Some of these official DNA Testing Schemes have evolved into DNA Control Schemes, usually after several years of operation as an official DNA Testing Scheme. A DNA Control Scheme links DNA testing to registration, limiting registration to those dogs that are either DNA tested normal or those that are hereditarily clear, i.e. the offspring of two DNA tested normal parents. More about control schemes will follow later in this guide.
Will there ever be a DNA test for complex hereditary diseases?
Presently, all of the available DNA tests relate to diseases that are the result of single gene mutations. However, technology doesn’t stand still and increasingly sophisticated analytical tools are being developed which means that it will not be that long before breeders are provided with DNA tests that identify the multiple genetic mutations involved in the complex inherited diseases.
Breeding Advice – How can breeders use these screening schemes?
Breeders use health screening, whether it be clinical screening or DNA testing, to try to predict what genes a dog carries and therefore what it is likely to pass on to its offspring, to try to reduce the prevalence. Remember, each dog has two copies of each and every gene and one copy is inherited from the dog’s dam and the other from its sire. Screening a dog before it is bred from will thus provide valuable information to the breeder and help them avoid matings which run the risk of producing a clinically affected offspring.
The difference between ‘clinically clear’ and ‘genetically clear’ is vital.
For diseases that result from single recessive gene mutations, clinical screening programmes identify the clinically affected dog, but they cannot discriminate between a dog that is clinically and genetically normal, with two normal copies of the gene, from the clinically normal carrier, with one normal gene and one mutant copy of the gene. Identification of the affected dog is valuable, however, because you know that if the dog is bred from, each of its offspring will receive a copy of the recessive mutant gene, whether it then goes on to develop the disease or not will be determined by the gene copy it receives from the other parent. The most effective way of breeding away from disease in a breed will vary depending on the disease frequency and the breed in question. Generally the use of affected dogs for breeding should be avoided. Knowing that a dog is clinically affected provides the breeder with far more information. For example, if the affected dog’s parents are both clinically normal, they must both be carriers of the mutation, because both must have passed a mutant gene onto the affected offspring. Furthermore, each of the affected dog’s clinically normal siblings will have a 2 in 3 chance of being a carrier. Breeders can also predict the likelihood that the aunts and uncles and cousins of an affected dog are carrying a version of the mutant gene. All of this is important information that will allow breeders to select mating pairs to minimise the spread of mutant genes to future generations. Many of the conditions that are examined under the BVA/KC/ISDS Eye Schemes are the result of single, recessive mutations.
Tackling complex conditions
The BVA/KC Hip and Elbow Schemes are designed to help breeders address complex inherited conditions. Again, the hip and elbow scores are believed to reflect the genetic makeup of an individual dog and both schemes offer advice to the breeder using the scheme.
For example, an individual dog’s hip score can be measured against the average hip score for the breed; dogs with scores lower than the breed average have above average hips and dogs with scores above the mean score have below average hips. Breeders are thus advised to have their breeding stock hip scored before breeding and then to breed from dogs and bitches that have hip scores well below the breed mean score.
Responsible breeders use the BVA/KC Hip Scheme in large numbers, particularly in those breeds where hip problems are present, and analysis of the year on year data suggests that through selective breeding they are managing to reduce the breed average hip score.
An evaluation of BVA and Kennel Club Schemes can be found at www.doggenetichealth.org.uk
Looking to the future
Health screening based on DNA testing for the presence or absence of mutant genes is expanding rapidly as more and more DNA tests become available. In many ways these represent the ‘Rolls Royce’ of health testing because they are based on the genes that a dog carries, unlike the clinical screens which predict the genetic make-up from clinical observations. This gives much greater precision to breeders’ breeding selections based on DNA results. Again, the aim is to test all potential breeding stock before they are bred from. One of the main advantages of DNA testing is that the DNA a dog is born with is essentially the same DNA as it dies with, so dogs can be DNA tested early in life and the result will not change during the dog’s life.
This means that such tests are particularly valuable for those late onset diseases; dog’s can be DNA tested early in life and if they are affected, the DNA test will show this long before any clinical signs become apparent, and breeders can take this information into account when deciding whether to breed from the dog or not, or when choosing a compatible mate.
DNA Control Schemes – Shaping Kennel Club Registrations
In 2000 a DNA test was provided to Irish Setter breeders in the UK which allowed them to assess the genetic status of their dogs with regard to an inherited disease known as Canine Leucocyte Adhesion Deficiency (CLAD). This was known to be caused by a single recessive mutation in a gene that was crucial for normal immune surveillance. Setters that inherited two copies of the mutant gene were clinically affected and severely immunologically compromised because they couldn’t mount a response to even simple infections. Following consultation with the Irish Setter breed clubs an official DNA testing scheme was established and the breeders agreed to have all of their dogs tested before considering whether they should be mated. Few clinically affected dogs were identified because the condition usually leads to death or euthanasia early in life, long before the affected dog reaches reproductive age. However, clinically normal carriers were identified as a result of DNA testing and the breeder community agreed that if they had a dog that DNA tested as a carrier, and if they decided to breed from that carrier dog, then they would only mate it to a DNA tested normal dog.
This they could do with confidence knowing that none of the litter would become clinically affected, because each of the puppies would get a normal gene from the DNA tested normal parent, which would override any recessive mutant gene that it might inherit from the carrier parent. Furthermore, the breeders agreed to DNA test all of the puppies in the litter to identify those that were genetically normal and those that were carriers. During the next five years over a thousand Irish Setters were DNA tested and breeder selections based on these results were so successful that a DNA Control Scheme was introduced in 2005, meaning that the KC would only register Irish Setter litters from parents that were either DNA tested normal or were hereditarily clear.
What health screening schemes are relevant for my breed?
Currently available health screening is very much dependent on the breed of dog that you are interested in. The Kennel Club introduced its Accredited Breeder Scheme back in 2004 and central to this is an obligation for Scheme members to health check their breeding stock with all available schemes for the breed. So, a look at the breed health screening programmes under the Accredited Breeder Scheme will give you a good idea of the breed specific health screening that is available.
This will show the required and recommended health screening schemes for each breed. The distinction between required and recommended is largely operational. For a scheme to be required, we need to be able to check for member compliance at the point of litter registration. This means that only official KC screening schemes can be required, because these are the only schemes for which results are present on our registration database. The recommended schemes are those that are run by individual breed clubs, where the KC does not have direct access to the dogs that have been screened and their result. A recommended scheme does not mean that the health screening is less important.
Correct at time of print March 2010
Do you wonder what Hip Scoring is about?
In the natural ‘wolf’ state, the canine hip is a tight,
well-fitting, ball and socket joint that permits full
athletic function throughout the animal’s entire life
without the development of degenerative change.
Such hips are still the norm in greyhounds, but relatively
few other dogs today have such perfect joints.
This is probably because domestication has removed
the ‘survival of the fittest’ process by which natural
selection occurs in the wild and because of selection
by breeders for other traits, which has unwittingly
perpetuated less than perfect hips.
Laxity of the soft tissues of the joint leads to subluxation
or even complete luxation, resulting in abnormal
stresses being placed on the bony and soft tissue components
of the joint. This, in turn, results in remodelling
and in many cases progresses to osteoarthritis
(Fig 1). When hip dysplasia is present, secondary
changes are likely to worsen with age.
The physical conformation of the hips (phenotype) is
influenced partly by environmental factors (eg, weigh
and diet) and partly by genetic factors (genotype), which
are governed by an unknown number of genes. As the
condition is polygenic, development of a genetic screening
test, while not impossible, lies some way in the
Although certain clinical manipulations may indicate
whether a hip is markedly loose, it is not usually
possible to assess the state of a dog’s hips by clinical
examination. Many dogs with hip dysplasia do not
show signs of lameness or discomfort until later in life,
by which time they may have been used for breeding.
Careful selection of breeding stock is known to
reduce the incidence of hip dysplasia in the offspring.
At present, such selection is made by assessing the hips
of potential sires and dams radiographically
Hip radiographs are assessed at one or two scoring
sessions that are held each week at the BVA’s headquarters
in London. Two scrutineers from a panel of 11
examine about 270 sets of radiographs (as printed film
or in digital format) during each session, which lasts
for several hours, agree on a score and sign the scrutineers’
part of the certificates. All the scrutineers have
further qualifications in radiology and/or orthopaedic
surgery and have many years of experience in assessing
hip radiographs. The whole panel meets annually
to discuss matters pertaining to the hip scheme and to
review a quality control exercise that runs throughout
Each hip (right and left) is examined for nine different
anatomical features and a numerical score is given, with
points being ascribed to abnormal features (Table 1). For
eight of the features the score may be 0 to 6, and for
one the score may be 0 to 5. The total score for each
hip is then calculated (range 0 to 53), as is the total hip
score (range 0 to 106). Hips with a perfect radiographic
appearance score 0; the higher the score, the greater
the degree of hip dysplasia ± secondary degenerative
change. This scheme therefore allows a wide range of
abnormality to be described, unlike some other hip
dysplasia schemes in which only a handful of different
by Ruth Dennis www.bva.co.uk